A*-Thought-V2: Efficient Latent Reasoning via Geometric Dynamics of LLM
Abstract
A*-Thought-V2 models chain-of-thought reasoning as hidden-state trajectories to selectively retain explicit reasoning steps or compress them into continuous latent tokens, improving accuracy and efficiency.
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) improves the reasoning ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) but incurs substantial computation and context costs. Existing methods either lose intermediate information through hard pruning or lack a principled criterion for continuous compression. We present A*-Thought-V2, a geometric dynamics of LLM guided framework that models CoT as a hidden-state trajectory and replaces hard deletion with an explicit-implicit interleaved latent architecture. After projecting question, step, and solution representations into a 3D PCA space, it measures alignment between each local transition and global question-to-solution direction. Aligned steps remain explicit text, whereas deviating steps are compressed into continuous latent tokens. Directional angles capture both local semantics and reasoning dynamics: small angles indicate direct execution and answer formation, while large angles more frequently involve checking, correction, and branch exploration; their temporal variation reveals exploration, convergence, and refinement stages. To train this architecture, we introduce stepwise embedding forcing, which pools each redundant step into a single latent embedding, and label forcing, which supervises that latent token with a soft multi-modal vocabulary distribution instead of a hard one-hot label. Experiments on Qwen3.5-9B and Qwen3.6-27B across six in-domain and out-of-domain benchmarks show that A*-Thought-V2 improves average accuracy by up to 2.6% while reducing response length by up to half, increasing Accuracy per Computation Unit by 2.29times, and reducing preprocessing and training time by 94.6% and up to 80.3%, respectively. Representation analyses suggest that latent states form a compact region distinct from textual states, while higher entropy at latent-token positions reflects broader soft targets that encourage richer step-level feature learning.
Community
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- Latent-Aligned Reasoning for Multimodal Recommendation (2026)
- Balancing Efficiency and Efficacy: Training-Free Attention-Guided Switching Between Explicit and Latent Thoughts for MLLMs (2026)
- OPLD: On-Policy Latent Distillation for Multimodal Reasoning (2026)
- Training Continuous Chain of Thought Models: A Tale of Two Regimes (2026)
- LUT: Latent Utility Training for Visual Reasoning (2026)
- MUX: Continuous Reasoning via Multiplexed Tokens (2026)
- SLPO: Scaling Latent Reasoning via a Surrogate Policy (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2609.07821 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 2
xxang/AStar-Thought-V2-Qwen3.6-27B
Datasets citing this paper 1
xxang/AStar-Thought-V2-OpenR1-Math-3k
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper