Papers
arxiv:2605.29498

Mask the Target: A Plug-and-Play Regularizer Against LoRA Forgetting

Published on May 28
Authors:
,
,
,

Abstract

Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) fine-tuning can cause significant forgetting of prior capabilities when adaptation distributions differ from original training data, but a novel output space regularizer helps balance new learning with retention without requiring additional data or architectural changes.

Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) has become one of the most widely used fine-tuning mechanisms for adapting large language models to new domains, tasks, and users. Yet adaptation performance alone can obscure an important failure mode: LoRA updates may improve performance on the target distribution while degrading prior capabilities learned during pretraining and alignment. We show that this forgetting becomes especially severe when the adaptation distribution differs substantially from the models original training or alignment distributions. The challenge is amplified in practical settings, where the original training and alignment data are typically unavailable. Motivated by this constraint, we study how LoRA based adaptation balances new learning against forgetting in a replay-free setting, and introduce a simple output space regularizer that can be added directly to existing training pipelines. Our method removes the ground-truth token from both the base and adapted model distributions, renormalizes the remaining probabilities, and applies KL regularization only over the non-target vocabulary. This preserves the base models relative preferences among alternative tokens without directly opposing the cross-entropy signal required for adaptation. As the regularizer acts only at the loss level, it requires no replay data, architectural changes, adapter redesign, or inference-time overhead, and can be applied directly to existing LoRA variants. Across all LoRA variants tested and across various backbones, our method improves the frontier between new learning and forgetting when the adaptation distribution differs substantially from the base models original training or alignment distributions, suggesting a broadly applicable route toward more reliable LLM updating.

Community

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2605.29498
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.29498 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.29498 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.29498 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.