Avi Fenesh PRO

I actually didn't try to mask further, but you made it interesting to try.
The published acceptance scalar is accepted/drafted. It also logs accepted tokens per verify round and conditional acceptance by draft position. So your second decomposition is the matching one for my numbers: roughly 6.6–7.7% step-cost saving, rather than the 8.25% i.i.d. estimate. I also agree the DFlash2 M5 Max result is not directly portable to my RTX Blackwell/Memra/NVFP4 setup.
I did try DFlash2, but with my rig it doesn't reproduce the results mentioned; the gains are
Workload MTP K=3 DFlash2 DFlash2 delta
16 chat prompts, steady 78.82 tok/s 80.51 tok/s +2.1%
16 agentic prompts, steady 77.81 tok/s 81.66 tok/s +4.9%

Nice improvement, but there's something else that also affect the numbers.

If you want the exact pack I built for this - https://huggingface.co/Avifenesh/Qwen3.8-27B-NVFP4-MTP-GGUF

Head stays native NVFP4. The ranks list is q38-ranks-sxc32768.gguf.txt on that repo if you want the trimmed-head path instead of a separate GGUF head.

Yeah that tracks. I kept thinking a fatter head would just be more accurate. Same trap. When I requantized the trimmed head to NVFP4, acceptance didn't move. Zero. The draft only has to land tokens the target will take, not match the BF16 parent. Your 48.3 to 33.1 from bumping NVFP4 up to Q5_K/Q6_K is the same movie the other way. I'll read the writeup.